EPA Proposes New Rules For Asbestos; Anti-Asbestos Advocates Concerned

In June 2016, former President Obama signed the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act as an amendment to the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), and since then, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been moving forward in naming asbestos – as well as nine other chemicals – as toxic substances that will come under review under new TSCA legislation. For decades, loopholes in the TSCA has kept asbestos and other potentially harmful chemicals and products legal in the United States, but under this new act, the EPA is obligated to take action if a substance is found to be a dangerous risk to the population and surrounding environment.

Below are the first 10 chemicals to be evaluated for potential health and environmental risks as of December 2017:

  • 1,4-Dioxane
  • 1-Bromopropane
  • Asbestos
  • Carbon Tetrachloride
  • Cyclic Aliphatic Bromide Cluster
  • Methylene Chloride
  • N-methylpyrrolidone
  • Pigment Violet 29
  • Tetrachloroethylene, also known as perchloroethylene
  • Trichloroethylene

The EPA is required to release a scoping document for each chemical on the list that will include hazards, exposure, conditions of use, and a list of those in the population who can potentially be exposed. Recently, the EPA announced the release of problem formulation documents, which attempt to further examine the scoping documents. However, this adds another step before risk evaluations can be drafted  and does not take into account the different ways that people can be exposed to asbestos (ie., through contaminated drinking water, air). Anti-asbestos advocates strongly believe that this curtails the plan to eventually ban the known carcinogen.

The EPA has also proposed the Significant New Use Rule (SNUR), which is designed to investigate past uses of asbestos. Currently, there are 16 uses of asbestos that are no longer utilized and under this proposed rule, if an individual manufactures, imports, or processes asbestos in any one of these outdated ways, that individual is required to notify the EPA at least 90-days beforehand. The EPA is then required to review those methods and decide if it will present a health risk to the public or environment. However, the EPA has ruled to not to further evaluate asbestos that is already in place in homes, schools, buildings, and other public structures. This is because the current  administration believes that once asbestos is applied, it is perfectly safe, despite decades of scientific proof proving otherwise.

Additionally, the Application of Systematic Review in TSCA Risk Evaluations (MAY 2018) was published to provide systematic reviews in the risk evaluation.

The wide-spread use of asbestos throughout the 20th century has allowed the carcinogen to be present today in many households, and household products such as flooring, insulation, cement walls, and siding. Asbestos is the only known cause of mesothelioma, a fatal cancer that affects the lining of organs and soft tissue (mainly the lungs and abdomen). The easily inhaled fibers are sharp, and become trapped, forever lodged in areas such as the lung, throat, stomach, colon, and heart.

For years asbestos companies and manufacturers knew about the dangers of asbestos, but chose to stay silent, placing profits above workers’ health. For over 30 years, the attorneys at GPW have helped thousands of local workers protect their rights and those of their families. If you are suffering from an asbestos-related illness, contact us today for a free, no obligation consultation.



William C. Schillaci, “New Rule for Asbestos Proposed,” EHS Daily Advisor (June 5 2018). [Link]

Alex Formuzis, “Scott Pruitt Refuses to Ban New Uses of Asbestos, Cooks Book on Toxic Chemical Evaluations,” EWG (June 1, 2018.) [Link]

Allison Bolt, “The EPA Will No Longer Evaluate the Health Risks of Asbestos Because Trump Believes it’s 100 Percent Safe,” Paste Magazine (June 7, 2018). [Link]


Related Posts

States are Suing the…

States are Suing the EPA for not Protecting People from Asbestos Eleven attorneys general are suing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for not protecting people from asbestos. Asbestos is a…
Read more

Cleanup Finished on a…

Cleanup Finished on a Section of the Libby Superfund Site A section of the Montana asbestos cleanup site was removed from the Superfund list by U.S. officials, pointing to the…
Read more

The Introduction of the…

The Introduction of the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act Earlier last month, the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act (ARBAN) was introduced. If passed, it will ban the use…
Read more


  • Never Pay a Fee Unless We Win Your Case!